There have been high numbers of deaths involving fire arms in the United States, and people are beginning to take a stand against the violence and look for ways to solve the problems. Gun control is inflicting stricter and more harsh regulations on owning and carrying fire arms, which many people believe is the answer. The Pros of Gun Control 1. If the laws and regulations where made to be much stricter and more regulated, then the amount of people who die from gun violence could possibly go down drastically.
Born in the UK, he currently lives in Florida. The debate over gun control in the USA is passionate and the issue controversial. Proponents believe that gun control will reduce violent deaths and murders.
Those opposed believe that controls are an attack on fundamental individual freedoms.
Source This article contains a list of the main arguments for and against gun control laws in the USA. The issue of gun control has been intensely debated in the USA over the years. The discussion never fully goes away and is often reignited by outbursts of gun violence by crazed individuals, such as the Virginia Tech shootings, the attack on U.
Some of the arguments over gun control reflect practical concerns, such as issues of self defense and violent crime, some reflect values and traditions, and others are more legalistic in nature and revolve around different interpretations of the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.
Here are the essential pros and cons of gun control laws. All too often in such a contest, logic loses. Gun control is necessary, and delay means more death and horror. Guns make it much easier to kill people.
As well as killing others, guns also make it easier for people to commit suicide and kill themselves.
The collective self-defense argument that the USA needs militia groups to protect the country from the threat of invasion are spurious, to say the least, given the power of the US military.
Some amateur militia groups within the USA, who are answerable to no one, are actually more potentially dangerous than foreign powers. There are ethical arguments as to why the Second Amendment is not absolute. Basically, no right is absolute if it clashes with other rights.
For example, even the right to free speech is restricted if you accuse a public figure of disreputable behavior, when you know this to be false. There are also questions regarding where to draw the line with regard to private armaments. Guns were the predominant weapon at the time of the American Revolution, but nowadays we have bazookas, plastic explosives, bomber aircraft, and tanks — should any private citizen be allowed to own those items too?
The NRA is a strong lobby group, as well as offering programs that teach firearm competency and safety to youth and adults, as well as civilians and law enforcement.
We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. Proponents of gun control believe that there needs to be more regulation of gun sales and ownership.
Source As for gun control advocates, I have no hope whatever that any facts whatever will make the slightest dent in their thinking - or lack of thinking. All other arguments regarding gun ownership are therefore irrelevant. The Second Amendment to the US Constitution clearly guarantees the right to possess firearms by individual citizens, the people who dispute this are misinterpreting the US Constitution.
This right has been upheld by the courts on many occasions. Gun possession by individuals is vital for legitimate purposes such as self defense and hunting and should not be interfered with by the authorities.
Guns can deter criminals and reduce crime without ever being used. Gun ownership by both individuals and militias provide security for the American people against foreign invasion and also government tyranny - if the American people were disarmed and some kind of dictatorship emerged, the people would be at its mercy.
If gun use is restricted, then criminals and murderers will just use different weapons, such as knives. Guns are used by many people for hunting and self-defense purposes. Many people, especially in rural areas where there is little protection from the police, regard them as vital.
And I agree with Mayor Michael Bloomberg: Advocates for gun control believe that too often guns fall into the hands of the wrong people. We need bullet control!
I think every bullet should cost 5, dollars.Readers' Comments DACA and the DREAM Act: Top 2 Pros & Cons Sanctuary Cities: Top 3 Pros and Cons Illegal Immigration, Population Estimates in the United States, Demographics of Immigrants in the United States Illegally Illegal Immigration around the World: 13 Countries Compared to the United States 12 States (and DC) That Allow.
The pros and cons of gun control are a topic that are not likely to go away any time soon. Recent shootings that have happened across the country over the past decade, along with the push for legislation banning or regulating certain types of firearms have all caused many to review the gun control pros and cons that are expected to shape future debate.
Gun Control Group Project “Guns in America” Gun Control Group Project Opinions In the United States of America, we as citizens have the right to bear arms, provided to us by the second amendment to the U.S.
constitution, and are part of the United States Bill of Rights.
Introduction And Conclusion To Gun Control. stringent gun control?This is a question that has been sparking nationwide in America. Gun control is simply defined as a regulation of selling, owning, and use of vetconnexx.com debate has many arguments saying that the U.S should have stricter gun laws to prevent fewer crimes or some even say to abolish the Second Amendment of the United States.
The Pros and Cons of Gun Control in the United States Essay The best part about owning a gun is you can keep burglars or vandals at bay without even having to fire your gun;, just the sight of a gun will keep people from trying to break into your homes.
The cons are easy as well currently billions of public money is being hijacked by gun control laws and interventions that serve absolutely no useful to citizens purpose. Million of man hours lost and resources wasted as recording of guns and people serve no useful to crime purpose.